Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : ENDOSKELETON II [Photomanip]
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/8782/faceiu1.jpg
src:http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/7206/52576928489498gu2.th.jpg (http://img132.imageshack.us/my.php?image=52576928489498gu2.jpg)
what y'all think?
I had to put a completely different persons nose on her
plz comment on DA too for full size
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/36417988/
steve2112
07-18-2006, 08:15 PM
Dude i think it rocks. Though the nose looks weird. I think if it was a womans nose it could be sexier and it looks abit askew in relation to the angle of the face. But besides that it feaking rocks. Looks like it would be in the manual for a sci-fi computer game or something similiar
MonkeyMayhem
07-18-2006, 08:23 PM
Nice -
Red Kittie Kat
07-18-2006, 08:24 PM
Overally very kewl ..... but if you have that nose on another layer try to bring it up and to the right just a bit ... its throwing me off for some reason :)
JaCkinbOx
07-18-2006, 10:07 PM
It's a great start. Check your lighting and textures, though. They're a bit off. And I'm not keen on how blurry the portion of hair on the left is when most everything else is in focus.
And yeah, fix the nose.
It's a great start. Check your lighting and textures, though. They're a bit off.
in what ways and where?
thx :)
JaCkinbOx
07-19-2006, 03:03 AM
Well, the textures (though splendid) are suffering from a lighting problem. They appear painted onto the face instead of actually being within it.
Samakimoto Graphics
07-19-2006, 05:43 AM
After watching "The Devil's Advocate" for the nth time last night, things are still fresh in my mind... this is good!
And yes, the nose is slightly off - the nosetrils are too obvious for the angle of her face, compare with the original photo...
Red Kittie Kat
07-19-2006, 05:03 PM
The Devil's Advocate - loved that movie :D
JaCkinbOx
07-19-2006, 05:24 PM
I would like to add that this would be a great piece for your portfolio, as it is. It's just that, to someone as perfectionistic as myself, I'll still have something to comment on. The common man is impressed by lower standards than I have.
SnowAngel
07-19-2006, 06:17 PM
Yup, I noticed the nose too, and for some, it'll be something that they'll zone in on. What happened to the original nose that you had to replace it?
to be honest, I would not have noticed the nose at all unless you mentioned it beforehand. I mean ya, the nose could use some fixing (the angle on the face mostly) but I think the nose is not the center of attention here; the eye is. If it were me, and I were glancing at this picture I would immediately be impressed. I think the nose is only noticed when you're looking for something wrong, ya know? again, not to say it can't use some touching up, I'm just trying to give some positive reinforcement :)
JaCkinbOx
07-20-2006, 01:39 AM
Yes, at a glance, it is very impressive. I was quite pleased at it for the first few seconds. But if it's to be appreciated at length, these imperfections need to be addressed.
nyc_skater
07-20-2006, 02:30 AM
Is that a watch you used for the eye or am I imagining things?
SurfPark
07-20-2006, 09:06 AM
It reminds me of the movie "Mirror Mask."
1ooScreamingTrees
07-20-2006, 04:51 PM
Great work...
But why the unreadable tech trendwhore text?
It is not communicating anything at all...other than "I was made in the later 90's early 2000's," and that's not in a positive light. Removing these blurbs of illegible "techy" text will greatly improve the overall impression of the piece.
With these elements left in, the piece becomes timestamped, and already feels dated.
JaCkinbOx
07-20-2006, 05:26 PM
I gotta disagree with you, there. It's not bugging me at all.