vxhorusxv
08-26-2007, 03:09 PM
Hey all,
I have a bit of a conundrum that I am hoping you will lend me your opinions on. At the beginning of the summer I took on one of my first freelance clients. I have worked in-house for several years and done independent projects for myself and for friends, but all of the independent projects I worked on were for people who had some appreciation for and understanding of design.
Unfortunately, I can not say my client has the same sense. The owner of the firm actually faxed me sketches after 3 rounds of work for the first project, which was fine [and they paid my rate with no questions asked] but the layout was bad - awful even. I spoke to my contact [not the owner] and explained why the layout was less effective than it could be and used a list of reasons to justify my position [none of them being "I like mine better" - I'm pretty open to feedback and collaboration]. At the end of the day the owner wanted it his way and I put together his layout.
That was 2 projects ago and I have [politely and politically] brought up the notion that the design would be more effective if moved into another arena - I even went so far as to show the CommArts Ad Annual from last year for examples of good concepts.
My problem is: even though I am giving them exactly what they want, I feel as though I am ripping them off because I know the designs are not nearly as good as they should be. Is this something that I just sort of say "the client is the boss" and smile and get paid or should I really continue to lobby for change? If it is change, can someone suggest a new path, clearly I'm walking up the wrong one =)
Thanks!
I have a bit of a conundrum that I am hoping you will lend me your opinions on. At the beginning of the summer I took on one of my first freelance clients. I have worked in-house for several years and done independent projects for myself and for friends, but all of the independent projects I worked on were for people who had some appreciation for and understanding of design.
Unfortunately, I can not say my client has the same sense. The owner of the firm actually faxed me sketches after 3 rounds of work for the first project, which was fine [and they paid my rate with no questions asked] but the layout was bad - awful even. I spoke to my contact [not the owner] and explained why the layout was less effective than it could be and used a list of reasons to justify my position [none of them being "I like mine better" - I'm pretty open to feedback and collaboration]. At the end of the day the owner wanted it his way and I put together his layout.
That was 2 projects ago and I have [politely and politically] brought up the notion that the design would be more effective if moved into another arena - I even went so far as to show the CommArts Ad Annual from last year for examples of good concepts.
My problem is: even though I am giving them exactly what they want, I feel as though I am ripping them off because I know the designs are not nearly as good as they should be. Is this something that I just sort of say "the client is the boss" and smile and get paid or should I really continue to lobby for change? If it is change, can someone suggest a new path, clearly I'm walking up the wrong one =)
Thanks!