Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : New Xerox Logo
Craig B
01-08-2008, 06:48 PM
I'm curious what everyone thinks of Xerox jumping on the Web 2.0 bandwagon.
http://i11.tinypic.com/6yxk6kx.jpg
Personally, as a print designer, it makes me cringe a little. I'm sure they have a "print version" somewhere, but it seems Web 2.0 simply for the sake of being Web 2.0 instead of truly being thought out.
I was curious what y'all thought about it.
morea
01-08-2008, 06:55 PM
I'm not a fan.
I got a kick out of Von Glitschka's comment about it on the "Brand New (http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/xerox_the_very_very_very_shiny.php)" site:
http://i6.tinypic.com/6ylv0yb.gif
Looks like they fudged on this "Marble Brand."
jonfisher
01-08-2008, 06:56 PM
I'm not a fan of the shiny "web 2.0" ball thing. I think if the ball was flattened out (ie: solid color) it would look better.
The old logo matched the hard edge look and feel of their machines. I hope they restyle the design of their machines to match the sleeker logo.
Navian
01-08-2008, 07:06 PM
oy!
That Xerox ball looks like some left over christmas candy.
I think someone had to much.
Edit:
Their older text logo:
http://www.goldhand.be/pfsweb/gimages/logo/Xerox%20logo.gif
The older "X" symbol:
http://www.inksmartshopping.com/images/xerox-logo.gif
budafist
01-08-2008, 07:59 PM
I don't like the ball, but prefer the new type.
Don't you know that a lowercase logo is more friendly and approachable? Capitals are for faceless corporations! The older logo was very epic with it's capitals. Foreboding even.
pantonedream
01-08-2008, 08:06 PM
personally, I think the materializing X spoke to what they do much more than this new croquet ball with an extra stripe does.
I also do not believe that every company requires a newer identity. There's something to be said for consistency.
morea
01-08-2008, 08:11 PM
the new version made me think of the new Kodak logo as soon as I saw it:
http://i10.tinypic.com/6u7qzp1.gif
Craig B
01-08-2008, 08:24 PM
True. the kodak letters are very similar to the xerox. I love the marble thing!
Jeff Fisher LogoMotives
01-08-2008, 09:45 PM
I think it's "icky."
- J.
doubting_thomas
01-08-2008, 09:48 PM
I don't like it. It makes me think more of Yahoo Pool than anything having
to do with print.
mojoprime
01-08-2008, 09:50 PM
i don't undertsand. this feels like somebody used an online logo generator. i mean, the two pieces don't seem to even relate to each other, and the "marble" looks an x-men logo ripoff. the doesn't feel like a smart move by such an established company.
morea
01-08-2008, 09:59 PM
I think it's "icky."
- J.
haha, is that the technical term? ;)
At least it's not "fugly". :D
its a four piece cricket ball made in china. btw, the old kodak look is so much better than the new one.
morea
01-08-2008, 10:19 PM
I hadn't even thought of this, but it's a really good point - this is a comment from the Brand New site:
A Case for Capitalization...
Xerox = noun
xerox = verb
From here on out I would expect them to use the lowercase in all correspondence. Every article, press release et al.
While it is certainly the trend to use the lower-case to convey a certain informality, such as at&t, kodak etc...those companies which use it aren't in the same position as Xerox is. Neither one has become synonymous in the vernacular with its core product (Kleenex, Popsicle.)
By using the lower-case in their treatment, they are reinforcing the name as verb, instead of as noun. They may legally own the trademark, they no longer own the meaning.
budafist
01-08-2008, 10:57 PM
It seems like quite an American trend to use brand names as verbs. We don't say Kleenex around here, we say tissue.
Then again, we don't say plastic wrap or cling film, we say Glad Wrap. Hmm....maybe not so American after all.
http://images1.buzzillions.com/images_products/08/73/103249_raw.jpg
Mynock
01-09-2008, 02:04 AM
You think you could be becoming Americanized?
budafist
01-09-2008, 02:23 AM
You think you could be becoming Americanized?
For sure. We watch American TV. Maybe not as much American TV as Americans since we also have TV from NZ, Australia and UK to watch too.
Drorain
01-09-2008, 12:49 PM
It seems like quite an American trend to use brand names as verbs. We don't say Kleenex around here, we say tissue.
Then again, we don't say plastic wrap or cling film, we say Glad Wrap. Hmm....maybe not so American after all.
http://images1.buzzillions.com/images_products/08/73/103249_raw.jpg
Note really an american thing, it's just evidence of good corporate branding. For a while when we were younger all video games were nintendos, currently all cola's are simply cokes. Computers, still called IBM or Mac, when IBM is actually running off hardware they've farmed out.
If you can have your brand become the noun, that's ultimate brand recognition
Jackimalyn
01-09-2008, 01:21 PM
ew!
captain spanky
01-09-2008, 01:28 PM
new font = like
blob = dislike
biscuits = like
CurtisS
01-09-2008, 02:13 PM
I fail to understand why corporations like Xerox, Kodak, AT&T, etc... feel the need to change from an internationally recognized logo. I shudder to think what Xerox paid for that uninspiring new logo...
Navian
01-09-2008, 05:46 PM
There is a city here in Utah, Logan. They paid some nut-job $56k to redo the city's logo:
http://www.ci.logan.ut.us/images/citylogo.gif
budafist
01-09-2008, 08:11 PM
http://www.aucklandcity.govt.nz/home/images/newlogo.jpg
I like this logo for our city, but I do think the price was a bit excessive. Our city paid $1 million for this new logo. Rate payers money.
ReneGade2012
01-10-2008, 05:35 AM
Well, I like the rounded edge font because it just looks cleaner. But, yes, that logo is way too generic.
Also, a million for that logo? You've got to be kidding right? I used to think 1500 for a logo was pricey!
GraphixNPrint
01-10-2008, 05:49 AM
http://www.aucklandcity.govt.nz/home/images/newlogo.jpg
I like this logo for our city, but I do think the price was a bit excessive. Our city paid $1 million for this new logo. Rate payers money.
I am moving my baby designers to NZ and make me some CASH! ;)
budafist
01-10-2008, 07:10 AM
I am moving my baby designers to NZ and make me some CASH! ;)
How about I let you know when I make my first million and then you come over and I'll give you some tips on how to break into the NZ market?
John G
01-10-2008, 07:14 AM
as long as IBM keeps their logo the same the world will be safe.
SurfPark
01-10-2008, 07:46 AM
I think its funny that they added the sphere logo. Of course, it has nothing to do with the business their in. Its simply an update of what they had. I think its fair to say that most people won't notice or care. Xerox has a strong enough brand to create any logo they want and have it mentally link with the office supply industry. I vote thumbs down.
budafist
01-10-2008, 08:25 AM
as long as IBM keeps their logo the same the world will be safe.
http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/6789/ibmjr6.jpg
Now what? :D
John G
01-10-2008, 10:59 AM
http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/6789/ibmjr6.jpg
Now what? :D
/wrists
PrintDriver
01-10-2008, 11:05 AM
Round letters and marbles. De-Evolution. It just reinforces my theory that by 2020 every company in America will be represented by a simple circle.
Jeff Fisher LogoMotives
01-10-2008, 01:58 PM
haha, is that the technical term? ;)
At least it's not "fugly". :D
Yep - another technical design term. It's doesn't quite live up to "fugly."
- J.
balou
01-10-2008, 02:11 PM
Is xerox selling balls of yarn now?
PrintDriver
01-10-2008, 04:41 PM
Pretty skimpy ball of yarn...
balou
01-10-2008, 06:26 PM
Yeah. I wouldn't buy their yarn. ;)
Danger_Mouse
01-10-2008, 06:35 PM
i can't help but notice that most of the people on the Executive Committee (http://www.xerox.com/go/xrx/template/inv_rel_newsroom.jsp?ed_name=Anne_Mulcahy&app=Newsroom&format=biography&view=ExecutiveBiography&Xcntry=USA&Xlang=en_US) for Xerox look like a bunch of old fuddy duddies.
There were probably dozens of great logo/brand concepts on the table, but I cant help but think that these old fogies got dazzled by some filter loving web designer who claimed Web 2.0 is the way of the future. Or did they outsource it? Either way....bluch
Xerox is a big corporation and I fear they are adding to an already snowballing web 2.0 trend...much to any GDer's dismay.
LeftBrain Artist
01-10-2008, 06:52 PM
The new signature incorporates a lowercase treatment of the Xerox name — in a vivid red Pantone 1797 — alongside a sphere sketched with lines, called "connectors," that link to form an "X", representing the company's connections to its customers, employees, partners, industry and innovation. The "connectors" are super-graphics that appear as reoccurring design elements.
Oh for the Love of God. I can't believe people actually eat this crap up. Vivid red Pantone 1797, huh. I suppose you couldn't describe it as "panic inducing", "stop light", or "danger", or "amsterdam red light district" red - too many negative connotations. But even so, "vivid red" brings to mind the scene from the Shining where the elevator doors open up to admit several thousand gallons of blood. That's a great color choice for a company like xerox.
"Connectors". In quotes? Like someone had to develop that descriptive word especially for this graphic? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that word has been part of the English language for quite some time.
OK, and aside from the fact that someone obviously went through a great deal of time and effort to arrive at "connectors" to describe Wolverine's slash marks without referring to adamantium, we're supposed to believe they symbolize the company's connections to its various peeps?
Here's my interpretation of the graphic symbology:
The red ball represents the ball gag the designer was forced to wear, effectively silencing the protests that would surely have been raised as this design abomination was ushered into existence.
The slashes on the ball called "slash wounds" symbolize the company's severed ties with good taste, originality, and reality. The fact that the inside of the ball is white indicates that the company's innards are bereft of substenance - essentially identifying the company a bloodless, soul-less creature, a.k.a. nosferatu.
PrintDriver
01-11-2008, 12:33 AM
LOL.
What a bunch of advertising drivel you've found there LBA. Kinda reminds me of http://www.quark.com/about/presscenter/prview.cfm?idx=633&alap=no
Gives me a whole new outlook on what are called 'super-graphics' these days. Just yesterday a super-graphic was a full building wrap...
razuel
01-11-2008, 12:47 AM
I have to be honest, I like their update to the at&t logo, but this one is just plain trash.
budafist
01-11-2008, 01:10 AM
I learned how to write drivel like that at GD school. :)
I got really good at it and I think well written drivel helps tutors when marking. Must have been all the Art His I did in high school.
PrintDriver
01-11-2008, 01:13 AM
methinks they dost explain to much.
A logo that needs buzzwords to explain it has failed in its purpose.
razuel
01-11-2008, 01:20 AM
What's really bad is that it doesn't even look like a sphere to me. They got the angle of the X wrapped around wrong or something.. and the shine ending short makes it look more like a sphere popping off of a flat surface rather than a plain sphere.
budafist
01-11-2008, 01:57 AM
Actually, it's not a sphere at all, it's a round button.
razuel
01-11-2008, 01:59 AM
Really? Everyone was calling it a ball so I just assumed. I guess it makes a little more sense as a button then.
budafist
01-11-2008, 02:02 AM
Really? Everyone was calling it a ball so I just assumed. I guess it makes a little more sense as a button then.
:) It's just my opinion. Sometimes I like to state my opinion as if it were fact. Sorry for any misunderstanding.
Danger_Mouse
01-11-2008, 02:03 AM
It's a Gobstopper people....sheesh
CkretAjint
01-11-2008, 02:15 AM
I always liked their pixelated 'x' arm from the past. I always thought it was strong and everyone knew what it was right away.... *shrugs* Definitely don't likethe new logo at all!
razuel
01-11-2008, 02:52 AM
:) It's just my opinion. Sometimes I like to state my opinion as if it were fact. Sorry for any misunderstanding.
Haha, I like that. But I definitely think it's a button now that you say that. Either that or a very bad sphere.
BJMRGTIVR6
01-11-2008, 02:58 AM
i can go with the text but the ball/button must go.
yuk!
I too liked the digitized X as it seemed more like a digitization of how their machines will work.
oh well. another rebranding gone amuck
xfxzone
01-12-2008, 01:34 AM
i like it!
budafist
01-13-2008, 01:48 AM
i like it!
Explain yourself at once
LeftBrain Artist
01-14-2008, 06:16 PM
Explain yourself at once
There's no need. "xfx"? Obviously xfxzone has a fetish for the letter x, and in all likelihood developed the logo in question. You can't diss your own work. I myself tend to favor logos featuring sleestacks.
budafist
01-14-2008, 07:33 PM
Makes perfect sense then. I love logos with buddhas on them. Or anything round and smiling in fact.
*scurries off to google sleestacks*
budafist
01-14-2008, 07:34 PM
Haha. (http://gabsmash.blogspot.com/2007/08/sleestack-sisters.html)
Satchel
01-14-2008, 07:44 PM
LMAO LBA :) that was a pretty good interpretation (http://www.graphicdesignforum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=469993&postcount=37)
icekitty37
01-18-2008, 12:52 AM
definitely looks too much like kodak and hte xbox logos combined!