Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : Good Reading Fonts
Eraser Nubbin
01-18-2008, 06:59 PM
What do you say?
Curious to know what others think. Putting together a book on traditional Inuit plant usage. More concerned about legibility then it having a traditional look.
Eraser Nubbin
01-18-2008, 07:28 PM
I know, I am boring, but I am leaning towards plain old Garamond.
morea
01-18-2008, 07:31 PM
I like Goudy, I just used that for a theater program.
Stone Serif is another good one.
frishka
01-18-2008, 08:22 PM
Ditto on Stone Serif. I also like Veljovic and Warnock.
garricks
01-18-2008, 10:48 PM
When I have a choice I use Adobe Caslon Pro 10/12. Another designer I know defaults to Palatino.
urstwile
01-18-2008, 11:07 PM
I've been flirting with a couple of the ones that come along with the Adobe Creative suite, Adobe Jenson Pro and also Warnock Pro. I agree with the choices above as well. I've also found Berkeley Oldstyle to be great for readability.
garricks
01-19-2008, 02:31 AM
urstwile, I looked on my CS2 Premium and CS3 Design premium discs and can't find Warnock Pro. Do you remember when/what/which installed it?
I also like Berkeley Oldstyle.
urstwile
01-19-2008, 02:33 AM
It's part of CS2, the standard install. I'm pretty sure I didn't do anything special to have them install.
garricks
01-19-2008, 02:42 AM
Thanks! For a minute I thought I'd have to dig the old G4 out and fire it up, but then I remembered I have CS2 installed on my laptop! Woo Hoo! I didn't migrate CS2 when I got my MacPro, I did a fresh install of CS3.
urstwile
01-19-2008, 02:43 AM
Have fun! :)
Drazan
01-19-2008, 12:20 PM
I just had a discussion yesterday with my coworker whether to change our new catalog font from Warnock to Berkley or basketville. We decided to stay with Warnock Pro.
Jade
Bowfinpw
01-19-2008, 02:16 PM
I hear what you're saying about familiar fonts, like Garamond, but there is a reason that Garamond, Caslon, Bembo, Janson and Baskerville have been used for hundreds of years -- people can read them. Maybe they are safe choices, but they will always work. A good way to judge what you might want is to go around picking up books and seeing what type they use, especially when you think it looks easy to read.
There are many good twentieth century typefaces as well: Centaur, Electra, Fairfield, Galliard, Perpetua, Berkeley O.S., Berling, Giovanni and Palatino are just a few.
The newer ones you have been mentioning are fine too. Font Bureau, Hoefler and Adobe have all made many solid useful new text families. It's almost hard to go wrong -- just find one you like and go with it.
Eraser Nubbin
01-21-2008, 12:57 PM
Thanks so much guys.
Warnock and Caslon were two that I was mulling over as well.
I assume that serif text is standard for a book?
The reason I ask is that our training was pretty technical. Some books I read seem to undermine each other.
Like for instance I read a book by Ogilvy that said research had proven that large bodies of text were often read in magazines and that windows and orphans did not break up the flow of reading. The same book also mentioned that the value of TV advertising was still up in the air as it was such a new media at the time ;)
TeeJay!
01-21-2008, 01:50 PM
I think Comic Sans is a great reading font
Not.
Eraser Nubbin
01-21-2008, 01:54 PM
This link is pretty rudimentary, but I found it helpful:
http://www.artbookbindery.com/layout.htm
GraphixNPrint
01-21-2008, 03:37 PM
I think Comic Sans is a great reading font
Not.
Who gets the pleasure of Tar and Feathering the newbie?? ;)
budafist
01-22-2008, 12:24 AM
Ooh Ooh can it be me!?
I don't have any feathers handy though. Can I used this bag of dried chili flakes instead?
GraphixNPrint
01-22-2008, 12:32 AM
Chili flakes will work in a pinch!
budafist
01-22-2008, 12:54 AM
Just no eye rubbing. Actually rubbing any delicate areas should be avoided. Oh wait, the tar should work as a good barrier.