tZ
04-22-2005, 09:21 PM
Well i belong to a paintball like team... the sport is called airsoft.
Any how I have gone about creating around seven or so differing designs for non profit. So our team can have a more sucessfull presence/existence (vector logos).
Any how, i log on to our team forum today and find a new thread focusing on selling a team shirt.
On that team shirt i find MY work in combination with some elses of less expertise and education. Basically the person took my iillustration off the interent as a JPEG and photoshoped it to create a modified design/composition of what i had done.
Now this shirt is for non-profit or so i am told. It was just done on a online t-shirt vendor. On where you submit graphics and they present a purchable product with no alteration to the submissions.
The question is should i be as angry as i am- which is very?
please correct me if i am wrong but i feel it to be inapproprate whether for non profit or not to use anyones work in combination with anyone elses unless a pre established arrangement has been made between parties.
I for one do not wish for my work to be in combination with anyone elses regardless of expertise profit or not (nice way of saying total N00b- this kid is 17).
I myself try to mantain the highest level of integrity in all my work whether profit is involved or not is irrelevent. All i ask is others maintain the same level of respect especially in regards to MY work.
Apparently alot of people like this design.
However, i myself as the designer i am find it to be very amatuer and unprofessional ultimatly a reflection upon me and my level of expertise since my illustration is incorperated into the composition.
I made a huge debate over the fact on terms of ethics in design whether profit is involved or not.
Apparently this is what i get in response from one of our team leaders (team as in sports team NOT design team,lol).
Furthermore, unless you copyrighted the design, there really isn't anything you can do, although that's a pretty shitty cop out in this case.
There really isn't anything i can do which is correct. Untill i heard this statement i was going to let them leave it in there with little fuse. After all is is "just" for the team and is non-profit.
However, inmaturtity as exhibited above pisses the hell out of me and i just find it appauling. So should i be upset and force the "dEsIgNeR" to rething the approach without my illustration in the composition?
Any how I have gone about creating around seven or so differing designs for non profit. So our team can have a more sucessfull presence/existence (vector logos).
Any how, i log on to our team forum today and find a new thread focusing on selling a team shirt.
On that team shirt i find MY work in combination with some elses of less expertise and education. Basically the person took my iillustration off the interent as a JPEG and photoshoped it to create a modified design/composition of what i had done.
Now this shirt is for non-profit or so i am told. It was just done on a online t-shirt vendor. On where you submit graphics and they present a purchable product with no alteration to the submissions.
The question is should i be as angry as i am- which is very?
please correct me if i am wrong but i feel it to be inapproprate whether for non profit or not to use anyones work in combination with anyone elses unless a pre established arrangement has been made between parties.
I for one do not wish for my work to be in combination with anyone elses regardless of expertise profit or not (nice way of saying total N00b- this kid is 17).
I myself try to mantain the highest level of integrity in all my work whether profit is involved or not is irrelevent. All i ask is others maintain the same level of respect especially in regards to MY work.
Apparently alot of people like this design.
However, i myself as the designer i am find it to be very amatuer and unprofessional ultimatly a reflection upon me and my level of expertise since my illustration is incorperated into the composition.
I made a huge debate over the fact on terms of ethics in design whether profit is involved or not.
Apparently this is what i get in response from one of our team leaders (team as in sports team NOT design team,lol).
Furthermore, unless you copyrighted the design, there really isn't anything you can do, although that's a pretty shitty cop out in this case.
There really isn't anything i can do which is correct. Untill i heard this statement i was going to let them leave it in there with little fuse. After all is is "just" for the team and is non-profit.
However, inmaturtity as exhibited above pisses the hell out of me and i just find it appauling. So should i be upset and force the "dEsIgNeR" to rething the approach without my illustration in the composition?