PDA

Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : Bell tolling for PNG graphics format?


benjo
06-09-2003, 01:53 PM
Bell tolling for PNG graphics format?

By Paul Festa

Staff Writer, CNET News.com

June 9, 2003, 4:00 AM PT









Learn more about Web graphics



A patent underlying one of the Web's most popular graphics formats is set to expire later this month, raising the question of whether a rival, open format, created as a royalty-free alternative, will become obsolete.



The situation has also rekindled debate about patents, innovation and the freedom of communication.



In the United States, the patent for the Lempel-Ziv-Welch, or LZW, compression algorithm expires June 20. LZW forms the basis of the popular GIF (Graphics Interchange Format) design.







LZW patent owner Unisys said it has no plans to apply for an extension to the U.S. patent, or to patents in Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, France and Italy--though it will enforce those latter patents for another year, until they too expire.



That development means that the rival PNG (pronounced "ping"), or Portable Network Graphics, format will soon lose its original reason for being.



"Unisys put the kibosh on using GIF in freeware," said Glenn Randers-Pehrson, editor of the PNG specification and a part-time high-tech munitions engineer at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif. "And that's what PNG was invented for."



But backers said PNG still has a lot to offer. And just last week, the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) announced its proposed recommendation for the second edition of the PNG format, with a call for public comment through June 23.



"The original impetus for designing PNG was indeed because something needed to be done urgently," said Chris Lilley, graphics activity lead for the W3C. "Everyone had been using this format (GIF) and then suddenly we couldn't use it anymore. (But) you always want something a bit better and never get around to it...(and) this provided the impetus--and PNG is better than GIF."



Whatever PNG's technical and intellectual-property advantages, it has never approached GIF in terms of adoption and remains a marginal presence among image formats on the Web.



Lilley conceded that PNG is not for everything. Photographs are better saved as JPG (pronounced "jay peg"), or Joint Photographic Experts Group, files, and GIF offers animation capabilities that PNG was not designed to provide--though a sister specification to PNG called MNG ("ming"), or Multiple-Image Network Graphics, does support animation.



Still, PNG has won a following among open-source developers, freeware providers and organizations, including some government bodies, that balk at the licensing terms attached to GIF implementations.



From "free" to fee

PNG was born just as the Web underwent its commercial transformation and technology companies began exerting their intellectual-property rights in earnest. Unisys, a corporate services and software company based in Blue Bell, Pa., announced in December 1994 that it would begin collecting royalties on its patent for the compression algorithm underlying GIF (and it redoubled its patent enforcement as the expiration date neared). Prior to the '94 announcement, the patent had gone unenforced since 1985.



The advent of licensing fees for software to create GIF images presented little problem for established companies like Adobe Systems, which supports the format in applications including its omnipresent and expensive Photoshop image-editing software.



But for individuals supplying free software, the fees were prohibitive.



The W3C published its first PNG recommendation in October 1996. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) began work on its own ratification of the format two years later.



Should the W3C and ISO both ratify the current drafts of the second edition, it will become available free of charge from the W3C under an exceptional agreement hammered out between the two standards groups. ISO normally charges for access to its publications.



At ISO, the PNG format last month reached its "60.00 status," the penultimate stage in the ISO process. At ISO the document is titled "ISO/IEC 15948."



Although PNG has remained comparatively stable technically, the second edition introduces support for Unicode, which lets the specification render characters in non-Roman alphabets. That helps it meet international requirements promulgated by ISO.



Backers of the image format sought an ISO-issued edition after some developers complained that they couldn't use it for government contracts without one.



Impatient with patents

Improvements aside, some view the issue through a more ideological lens. And seen that way, the continued existence of PNG can take on a symbolic dimension.



One antipatent activist urged the adoption of PNG specifically, but more generally nonpatented technologies.



"The big issue is not whether you use GIF or PNG," said Don Marti, president of the Silicon Valley Linux Users Group and Webmaster of Burn All GIFs Web site. "The big issue is whether you let a patent holder become a censor for your communications."



Conflict over patents has roiled standards organizations, with the W3C recently repudiating the use of patented technologies in its recommendations, and the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) reserving the right to implement them.



Marti, who in 1999 organized a "Burn All GIFs Day" protest against Unisys, compared the enforcement of software patents on communications software to the colonial-era Stamp Act. That act, passed in 1765 by the British Parliament, imposed a tax on paper and other writing materials used in the American colonies and was an impetus for the eventual revolution.



"A patent on communications, or on a format or a standard for communicating, is just like a stamp act," said Marti. "As soon as you decide to use a patented format to communicate, you give the patent holder a dangerous level of power over you."



But Unisys credited its exertion of the LZW patent with the creation of the PNG format, and whatever improvements the newer technology brought to bear.



"We haven't evaluated the new recommendation for PNG, and it remains to be seen whether the new version will have an effect on the use of GIF images," said Unisys representative Kristine Grow. "If so, the patent situation will have achieved its purpose, which is to advance technological innovation. So we applaud that."



<img border="0" src= "http://www.cbcamerica.com/images/webshots/benjobanner.jpg">

tallmikeG
06-09-2003, 02:37 PM
thanks for the article, benjo!

PixelBlender ("]<img border="0" src= " http://www.tallmike.com/images/banner.jpg">[/url]

...or visit my [url=") design blog!

benjo
06-09-2003, 03:22 PM
No problem Mike. I thought it would be interesting. I never new .gif was a property format. I thought it was a free standard the whole time.



What are the advantages of using .png? I was never educated in the diffrences.

<img border="0" src= "http://www.cbcamerica.com/images/webshots/benjobanner.jpg">

tallmikeG
06-09-2003, 03:40 PM
From lossy compression ("]http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/Internet/2002/JPG_GIF_PNG.asp[/url]


JPEG/JPG
Short for Joint Photographic Experts Group, the original name of the committee that wrote the standard. JPG is one of the image file formats supported on the Web. JPG is a Graphics Interchange Format[/I], another of the graphics formats supported by the Web. Unlike JPG, the GIF format is a pixels ("]lossless compression technique and it supports only 256 colors. GIF is better than JPG for images with only a few distinct colors, such as line drawings, black and white images and small text that is only a few transparency[/I], where the background color can be set to transparent in order to let the color on the underlying Web page to show through. The compression algorithm used in the GIF format is owned by Unisys, and companies that use the algorithm are supposed to license the use from Unisys.<SUP>*


PNG
Short for Portable Network Graphics, the third graphics standard supported by the Web (though not supported by all <img border="0" src= " http://www.tallmike.com/images/banner.jpg"> ("]browsers). PNG was developed as a patent-free answer to the GIF format but is also an improvement on the GIF technique. An image in a lossless PNG file can be 5%-25% more compressed than a GIF file of the same image. PNG builds on the idea of transparency in GIF images and allows the control of the degree of transparency, known as opacity. Saving, restoring and re-saving a PNG image will not degrade its quality. PNG does not support animation like GIF does.

[url=")

...or visit my PixelBlender ("") design blog!

benjo
06-09-2003, 05:06 PM
Oh so their compression rate is higher and it can't be animated.



Do you use .png in any of your work.

<img border="0" src= "http://www.cbcamerica.com/images/webshots/benjobanner.jpg">

tallmikeG
06-09-2003, 05:12 PM
i usually only use .png when i "export as transparent image" in Photoshop for web graphics. other than that, i usually use .gif or .jpg.

PixelBlender ("]<img border="0" src= " http://www.tallmike.com/images/banner.jpg">[/url]

...or visit my [url=") design blog!

andy
07-09-2003, 02:34 PM
We use .png's in some instances for importing into flash. They work better than .gif's in many cases.




DesignGraphics.org ("")

Compelling Banner, Logo & Graphic Design

Ryan8720
07-10-2003, 02:45 AM
I use tons of PNG's in my sites. They are the only format that supports the semi-transparent look (using alpha transparency), but it doesn't work in IE. Also, the PNG usually compresses better. Plus it supports 16 million colors.

<img border="0" src= " http://edgewebdesign.org/ryan2.gif"> ("")



If life gives you lemons, give them back.



It is better to be pissed off than pissed on.

07-10-2003, 11:58 AM
I try to use jpg as much as possible, because of it's compressed file size is excellent, and is usable in all browsers, we do use gif if we need a transparent overlaid image. PNG is okay i guess, we have never had much call for it though.


I wonder now that GIF is a non patent format can it be used in applications without having to pay a license or roayalty fee? It would be cool if we could as we have some apps we were going to put out as freeware that included the GIF format. Now if only we could get JPEG format usage without a fee that would be great for small application developers.



Allen

Allen Harkleroad

TIEM Design

http://www.TIEMdesign.com



Get inside my head at DontFear.com

http://www.DontFear.com



<img border="0" src= "http://gmpservicesinc.com/images/HMIC.jpg">

Fusiondesigner
04-12-2004, 02:37 PM
andy said...

We use .png's in some instances for importing into flash. They work better than .gif's in many cases.</div>




</div>So you're saying that when the movie is exported, the file
size is smaller with png?

take the kids to see a replica of what never was...
http://www.fusioneffect.com

Ryan8720
04-12-2004, 11:58 PM
An animated PNG is called a MNG and I have never seen one used for Flash. He is saying (I think) that when you import the PNG into the Flash file is it usually ends up with a smaller file size in the end.

http://edgewebdesign.org/ryan2.gif (http://www.edgewebdesign.org)

C:\DOS
C:\DOS\RUN
RUN DOS RUN