Hi,
I am hoping someone on here can shine some light on this situation of mine. I commissioned a newly graduate designer to develop a logo for a new business of mine. I am not a big entrepreneur, just a recent grad with a few creative ideas cooking. Anyway, a fee was agreed upon and work began with no contract drawn. I have finally settled on a design I really like and I mention about high res vector files being presented and usage rights because I had read that it is prudent that there are no nasty surprises at the close of deal, I then get an email back stating that the designers is prepared to offer me an annual (renewable) All Media License however I would only start paying in Yr.2 as the fee for designing the logo would cover the first year. Further more, depending on how the company is doing in a year's time then the designer will consider selling me an extended license if required.The designer's stated rationale is that there are bills to be paid and that a good logo can be of huge value to my launching business.
My issues are these - though we had no contract, I just assumed that the logo being designed would belong to me. My main issue was to see the designer tweaking it to produce something not dissimilar for future clients. I was not expect this licensing line. Also, how am I meant to assert any copyright or issue a trademark application on something I am leasing?
I have read a thread on here that leads me to believe that I really should not have to contend with this...I do not want to lease a logo that was developed for me. It is also a very personal logo in that the imagery represented are what I went into the consultation stating I want featured. This presents a unique problem in that should there be a breakdown and I am forced to seek the service of another designer, the finishes product will have 2 elements that this current logo has. What if the designer tries to take up issue with this? He is not only the logo he has designed to ransom but my creative (and emotionally invested) idea. I have email documentation that proves that these featured elements were brought to the design table by me and that I asked for them to be the gem that the logo was developed around.
In fact, this was the reason I wanted assurance that he would not be creating something of the like for any future clients...I was not expecting the licensing bombshell.
Where do I stand on this? Regarding asserting full rights over the logo developed especially in terms of trademark and also, should we be unable to agree on a way forward, about having someone else produce a logo for me that will inevitably feature the 2 key elements to be found on the currentt logo that has been designed.
I thank you all in advance for your thoughts on this matter.
I am hoping someone on here can shine some light on this situation of mine. I commissioned a newly graduate designer to develop a logo for a new business of mine. I am not a big entrepreneur, just a recent grad with a few creative ideas cooking. Anyway, a fee was agreed upon and work began with no contract drawn. I have finally settled on a design I really like and I mention about high res vector files being presented and usage rights because I had read that it is prudent that there are no nasty surprises at the close of deal, I then get an email back stating that the designers is prepared to offer me an annual (renewable) All Media License however I would only start paying in Yr.2 as the fee for designing the logo would cover the first year. Further more, depending on how the company is doing in a year's time then the designer will consider selling me an extended license if required.The designer's stated rationale is that there are bills to be paid and that a good logo can be of huge value to my launching business.
My issues are these - though we had no contract, I just assumed that the logo being designed would belong to me. My main issue was to see the designer tweaking it to produce something not dissimilar for future clients. I was not expect this licensing line. Also, how am I meant to assert any copyright or issue a trademark application on something I am leasing?
I have read a thread on here that leads me to believe that I really should not have to contend with this...I do not want to lease a logo that was developed for me. It is also a very personal logo in that the imagery represented are what I went into the consultation stating I want featured. This presents a unique problem in that should there be a breakdown and I am forced to seek the service of another designer, the finishes product will have 2 elements that this current logo has. What if the designer tries to take up issue with this? He is not only the logo he has designed to ransom but my creative (and emotionally invested) idea. I have email documentation that proves that these featured elements were brought to the design table by me and that I asked for them to be the gem that the logo was developed around.
In fact, this was the reason I wanted assurance that he would not be creating something of the like for any future clients...I was not expecting the licensing bombshell.
Where do I stand on this? Regarding asserting full rights over the logo developed especially in terms of trademark and also, should we be unable to agree on a way forward, about having someone else produce a logo for me that will inevitably feature the 2 key elements to be found on the currentt logo that has been designed.
I thank you all in advance for your thoughts on this matter.

Comment