This online community asked it's users to recreate famous logos in the Web 2.0 style
Here are a couple random images from the thread
Here are a couple random images from the thread
-
Profound WisdomŪ
- Oct 2004
- 6390
-
~♥~Glitteriffic!!~♥~
- Jun 2006
- 54805
-
Profound WisdomŪ
- Oct 2004
- 6390
-
~♥~Glitteriffic!!~♥~
- Jun 2006
- 54805
-
Big up yourself.
- Mar 2005
- 5308
-
Senior Member
- Jun 2006
- 2084
bmw is pretty slick, they might want to consider using that, that would look pretty slick on their cars.Comment
-
Graphic Designer
- Nov 2005
- 1359
Am I the only one that looks at web 2.0 logos and see the major zeitgeist? This collection is funny, but I think one of the main reasons its become such a joke is because the web 2.0 businesses all copy each other, meaning they style itself preceeds the application of the business they're representing. I'd love to see the community design these logos as if they're in the 1920's or maybe if they existed during the Italian renaissance...Comment
-
Banned- Mar 2004
- 1718
But that would require actual skill and thought and stuff. Web2.0 is not about skill and thought and stuff ^_^Comment
-
Graphic Designer
- Nov 2005
- 1359
You're right. Its about web applications, overnight success, and LOTS of glossy texture. If those logos were ever rendered in 3D, they'd be too slippery to hold.Comment
-
Banned
- Jan 2006
- 606
-
Banned
- Mar 2004
- 1718
-
Tetris Master
- Jan 2005
- 1540
I don't think I get the joke. Isn't Web 2.0 just a buzz word for the more interactive use of the web than 5 years ago? How does that affect a logo graphic? Or is that the point, and this is just making fun of the trend to make logos all glossy looking?Comment
-
Avatar Above
- Aug 2006
- 7847
I just read up on this because I was unaware.
Web 2.0 logos/graphics, use: large font, hatch lines, gloss, reflecting images, supermarket starbursts, gradients and maybe a few more things.
Also, the BMW looks like the emblem on the car and not much more than their logo.Comment
-
Mr. iMac
- Sep 2006
- 573
-
Avatar Above
- Aug 2006
- 7847
-
Today, 11:34 PMCommented to New engine and layout on Graphic Design ForumThanks for your feedback. I'm sure it will be useful. As for comment within a comment, do you think that's necessary? Sounds like a major thread hijack
-
Today, 10:45 PMCommented to New engine and layout on Graphic Design ForumI know the forum is in a state of flux but thought I'd make some comments about it anyway.
I don't recall exactly what the button was called (I think it was Todays Posts or New Posts) but... -
Today, 10:13 PMCommented to Which pantone booklets do I need?Thanks alot all of you. Bought the colour bridge. thanks for the tip about Indesign! -
Today, 09:30 PMCommented to Why can't I post a link?
Left and right feet!... -
Today, 09:13 PMCommented to Creating sketchy look or cross hatch in IllustratorYep, I would pencil sketch the basic shape and then use a black fibre tip pen on top. Kerm's suggestion of scanning and live tracing the result is good too.
-
Today, 09:12 PMCommented to i'm also a de-lurkerWelcome back!
-
Today, 09:11 PMCommented to Newbie
-
Today, 09:09 PMCommented to Walking Dead poster.Thanks very much, i'm seriously hopeless when it comes to text so all advice is greatly appreciated!
Glad I joined up to this forum, i've had such good feedback, thanks again everyone
Comment