Hi All, first post hope I keep using and contributing to this forum for years to come!
Quick question within a pre-press standpoint. I have sent artwork to a print vendor that was suppose to be 1 spot color and nothing else, printing offset. Unfortunately, there are a few strokes within the file that are CMYK based that look like the spot color but are not. We want to print the job 1 color, not 4/5 color.
Literally this is maybe 6 or 7 very small lines with an illustration. Is it possible from a pre-press standpoint to replace the CMYK referenced strokes with just the 1 spot color? Even more simply, the strokes are 100% all around, no tints. Since the job is printing 1 color, can't they just make 1 plate and be done?
Again we want the job to run 1 color only, but the printer is asking us to re-submit the artwork with the small issues corrected.
The reason why this is an issue is because this will then effect a huge run of other artwork that is using the same illustration. There would be a number of files that would require revising.
Thank you for the advice and hope to hear a response soon!
Quick question within a pre-press standpoint. I have sent artwork to a print vendor that was suppose to be 1 spot color and nothing else, printing offset. Unfortunately, there are a few strokes within the file that are CMYK based that look like the spot color but are not. We want to print the job 1 color, not 4/5 color.
Literally this is maybe 6 or 7 very small lines with an illustration. Is it possible from a pre-press standpoint to replace the CMYK referenced strokes with just the 1 spot color? Even more simply, the strokes are 100% all around, no tints. Since the job is printing 1 color, can't they just make 1 plate and be done?
Again we want the job to run 1 color only, but the printer is asking us to re-submit the artwork with the small issues corrected.
The reason why this is an issue is because this will then effect a huge run of other artwork that is using the same illustration. There would be a number of files that would require revising.
Thank you for the advice and hope to hear a response soon!


, what you just said makes more sense then what was thinking. You may call me a vacuous posterior now.
Comment