Announcement Announcement Module
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Albireo Design logo Page Title Module
Move Remove Collapse
Search Search Module
Collapse

Advertisement Advertisement Module
Collapse

Featured Images Featured Images Module
Collapse

Mediabistro Creative Sites Mediabistro Creative Sites Module
Collapse
Latest Topics Latest Topics Module
Collapse

  • ISitude
    Reply to Law Firm Logo
    ISitude
    I agree with the overall comments of the ampy and LLC being too stressed and the whole deal being centrally columnized....yes, columnized is not new word.
    Today, 04:51 AM
  • ISitude
    Reply to Working on a logo for myself
    ISitude
    Love the idea, I'm struggling with the execution.

    To me the beast should be a clear forceful/powerful movement of rising up. In your rendition it seems that this is much less so ...no power...
    Today, 04:39 AM
  • B
    Reply to Unused designs - who owns them?
    B
    You don't feel an obligation to turn them over and wouldn't without a fee. So far I'm with you, but then you say that you feel as though you can't use them because they were part of the process of creating...
    Today, 03:09 AM
  • B
    Reply to My Stonework company logo
    B
    Howdy Begeebuz. Welcome to the forum.

    Here are links to the forum rules and some useful information.We screen for spammers, so the first few posts...
    Today, 02:55 AM
  • EmberMike
    Reply to Unused designs - who owns them?
    EmberMike
    I don't think I'd ever feel obligated. And if requested I wouldn't hand them over for free. I've looked at it more as being a part of the final product. Even though I'm not handing over the sketches,...
    Today, 02:45 AM
Advertisement Advertisement Module
Collapse

Sponsors Sponsors Module
Collapse

X
Conversation Detail Module
Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Virgo Nightingale View Post
    The star-within-the-A reminds me specifically of another logo, but I can't think of it at this time. It'll come to me in three weeks when I'm not thinking about it.
    When I read this my mind immediately went to Alcoa, but that's not a star.
    This post is brought to you by the letter E and the number 9. Those are the buttons I push to get a Twix out of the candy machine.
    "I put my heart and my soul into my work, and have lost my mind in the process."

    Comment


    • #17
      I don't think there's a need to have the star in the "O", it doesnt' really add to anything and seems more like an afterthought.

      Try to mirror the use of the stars in both words. "Design" seems a bit weak in comparison to "Albireo".

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by kemingMatters View Post
        Not to be confused with SNASA or Secret NASA... you seem to have created some odd ligatures like eo.
        I've never been to the Moon... but I've been to the... Smoon...
        -B. Stinson
        Less marketing douchebaggery, MORE TANKS!

        Comment


        • #19
          Invader— This looks very good. I have a few things to suggest:

          Using the mark as a part of the name is a taboo with me. I would recommend using the mark separately —with the name as a subordinate element.

          The lettering of the name looks pretty good. With this custom letter design, I think the strut of the R would be better as a curve-down similar to the Microgramma R—rather than the diagonal used. I believe that the G should be slightly wider to allow room for the curve-up coming up from the base. I think the additional stars in the O and above the I are too much. With the mark as a separate element, I think the name would be better with with all the letters the same size, rather than over-size initials. Let the mark be the focal point of the signature.

          About letters touching and letter spacing: Letters touching or joining, forming a custom unit works well when it does not look forced or contrived in any way. The L and B are questionable in this regard. I keep thinking that the horizontal of the L should be slightly wider as a touch-unit. The E and O look forced but the E and S look good. The S and I are questionable. The vertical to vertical spacing is a little tight especially between the I and G of "design". You may be thinking the spacing there rather than seeing it. I mention this a lot but practice seeing the negative space in designs and type.

          In all cases here, "slightly" means very, very slightly. Good job.
          Last edited by sully1251; 05-18-2012, 04:35 PM.
          http://www.paulsullivanstudio.com

          Comment


          • #20
            I quite like the mark itself, but agree with what others have said about keeping it a separate element from the type.

            Comment


            • #21
              I feel slightly at a loss. I'm not from the US and had utterly no idea who the Steelers were until this thread! Though with a quick Google search, the fact that they use 4-pointed stars in their logo is about the only similarity. It seems like a rather tenuous connection to me. The power of association is a pretty amazing thing, isn't it?


              Originally posted by sully1251 View Post
              The lettering of the name looks pretty good. With this custom letter design, I think the strut of the R would be better as a curve-down similar to the Microgramma Rórather than the diagonal used. I believe that the G should be slightly wider to allow room for the curve-up coming up from the base. I think the additional stars in the O and above the I are too much. With the mark as a separate element, I think the name would be better with with all the letters the same size, rather than over-size initials. Let the mark be the focal point of the signature.
              Yes, the R doesn't sit right, does it? Thank you for the detailed advice. I'm going to spend some time working on this over the weekend!


              Originally posted by sully1251 View Post
              About letters touching and letter spacing: Letters touching or joining, forming a custom unit works well when it does not look forced or contrived in any way. The L and B are questionable in this regard. I keep thinking that the horizontal of the L should be slightly wider as a touch-unit. The E and O look forced but the E and S look good. The S and I are questionable. The vertical to vertical spacing is a little tight especially between the I and G of "design". You may be thinking the spacing there rather than seeing it. I mention this a lot but practice seeing the negative space in designs and type.


              I'm always trying to improve these kinds of things. Frankly, I'm always horribly finickity over my typography. Thanks for the hints. I think I probably will split the LB and the SI.

              The reasons for the EO and the star in the O were to make the O a little heavier, in an attempt to balance the extra weight the A is carrying with those two stars. Maybe in hindsight, this was slightly misguided. Perhaps it doesn't need it there...

              (I just like doing things with counter spaces. I think it's some kind of addiction!)


              Originally posted by sully1251 View Post
              In all cases here, "slightly" means very, very slightly. Good job.
              Thank you very much!




              Originally posted by sully1251 View Post
              Using the mark as a part of the name is a taboo with me. I would recommend using the mark separately ówith the name as a subordinate element.
              Originally posted by double A-ron View Post
              I quite like the mark itself, but agree with what others have said about keeping it a separate element from the type.
              This would seem to be the consensus opinion. Thanks. I'll tinker with it and try to sort that out!
              "Imagination is more important than knowledge."
              --Albert Einstein

              Comment

              Mediabistro A division of Prometheus Global Media home | site map | advertising/sponsorships | careers | contact us | help courses | browse jobs | freelancers | content | member benefits | reprints & permissions terms of use | privacy policy Copyright © 2014 Mediabistro Inc.
              Working...
              X