| General General Design Topics-No work requests in this forum, and no FREE requests or CONTESTS anywhere on this forum!!! |
04-30-2012, 08:10 PM
|
#11
|
|
Head Chee of Derpistan
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St. Louis City, Missouri
Posts: 36,897
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sketcher
Flash is a dying program. .
|
Not true.
It may be falling out of use on the web, but it's still being used to create interactive educational materials, and we're using it to create animations for patient information digital displays.
__________________
This post is brought to you by the letter E and the number 9. Those are the buttons I push to get a Twix out of the candy machine.
"I put my heart and my soul into my work, and have lost my mind in the process."
|
|
|
04-30-2012, 11:59 PM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,879
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by garricks
Not true.
It may be falling out of use on the web,
|
Thats what I meant - dying in terms of web use. More and more web designers are abandoning Flash for more mobile friendly and more reliable sources.
|
|
|
05-01-2012, 01:06 AM
|
#13
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 23
|
Flash in my opinion does more harm than good as it absolutely murders batter life on Androids. I'd much rather have a low quality image than having a higher quality flash image simply sap the life of my phone. I see the quandary as a designer, but perhaps it's time to let him know that pretty soon Flash won't even be a consideration.
Hopefully this is also a step in the right direction in creating a more cohesive mobile market where advertisers (and customers) will not have to worry so much about compatibility issues. I mean we did spend the last 20 years hammering out the details as far as that goes on PCs and laptops.
I do understand the argument that the flash file may be higher quality, but I also understand why he would want his site to be a little more universal. You're kind of in a tough situation right here now because html 5 isn't supported by all devices and flash is in the process of going the way of the dodo.
As stated earlier he may just have to do without the banner. Is it worth having a lower quality image or extended compatibility? Might just want to skip the banner altogether for now.
|
|
|
05-01-2012, 01:55 AM
|
#14
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,892
|
Has the project already been delivered or is this something that has been noted in the design stage? Either way did the contract/brief mention the site would provide alternatives to flash for devices that do not support it? If not than I would say this is more a problem with the hardware that can not be overcome – blame it on apple. Than again depending on what flash has been used for in most cases a sensible developer would use something other than flash. Though that starts to get into the quality of person who has been hired and budget of the job. I think it is perfectly acceptable to degrade and not show the banner. That is what graceful degradation is for. Besides… it is only decoration regardless of the hard on the client has for it. What does the banner do that is requires flash – swap images at different intervals or what?
Last edited by tZ; 05-01-2012 at 02:03 AM..
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13 PM.
|
mediabistro creative network
GRAPHICS.COM NEWSLETTER
The weekly Graphics.com newsletter is a great way to stay up to date on what's new on the site and in the world of graphics. Subscribe »
|
|