Hi every one, I’ m trying flat designs logo so I help from you
looking forward for your reply…
Im interested in solving my clients communication problems. If that means flat design, so be it. Maybe it does. Maybe it doesn’t.
Like Steve, I’m interested in doing whatever works to solve the problem in front of me.
As for flat logos, almost all well-designed, practical and broadly usable logos start out as flat, or as I would rather put it, simple, clean and easy to reproduce. If a logo needs some bling for various reasons, that’s fine too, but there aren’t many instances where a client can adequately get by using a logo that only works with that bling and can’t be reduced down to a simple shape.
Welcome to GDF iqrajadoon123,
Flat is nice. It depends on the use.
Agreed on the logo comments Steve_O and Just-B mentioned. Flat , recognizable, distinguishable first… Then glitz if needed
Line
Thanks alot LineDetail
“Flat Design” I think, is considered an actual style.
Sort of a 1-point perspective type of look where everything is reduced to its most minimal form.
I’m not a fan of it when it is used in its most cartoon effect with flat, blocky humans and no sense of depth.
Usually any initial logo lockup is made as a flat design as others have noted. But even there, the “usual” rule is sometime broken to great effect. Certain allowances have to be made when breaking the flat rule.