It simplifies the steps to create a logo with ChatGPT. What do you think?
You can find it here - https://thisisnotanailogomaker.com/
Have to throw a wrench in here: Can one claim it’s one’s creation?
I suppose it’s the lawmakers’ problem.
Well …
ChatGPT at least copied the wording right. NightCafe just writes what it wants lol 
ChatGPT:
NightCafe:
I suppose resolution-independent vector versions are no longer needed, nor is the ability to create spot color versions. Clients get exactly what they want, with no annoying designers to tell them otherwise. Besides, what they don’t know won’t hurt them — at least until the mess they create comes back to bite them on the butt.
I’m retiring out of this field at exactly the right time.
1 Like
It’s more likely the bottom feeders and crowd sourcing contests sites that will feel it most.
Apart from the generative fill in Photoshop, I’m completely ignorant on AI. Can it create usable vector versions of these logos?
Not yet. As I understand it, there are still some limitations that can’t yet be overcome. (I asked Google’s Gemini. 
)
AI can write perfect PostScript, but it doesn’t know how to properly construct the files, layer the objects, determine when precision is needed or not, where to position the handles, or separate one shape from the next to enable subsequent deconstruction of the logo for adding bling or simplifying for spot colors, among other things. It’s still not much better than the auto-trace feature in Photoshop.
I suspect another problem is that vector art is a niche technology used by professionals, whereas raster art will satisfy the demands of the average person. In other words, there isn’t a strong enough demand for vector art to justify solving the technical hurdles. I’m pretty certain it’s coming, though.