Thoughts on my portfolio site?

Hey GDF, 21 year old graphic design student here.

This is my first time posting here. I’m actually currently attending university for design and taking classes/studying. I’m expected to graduate in late 2025-mid 2026.

I’m not sure if it’s common here for current design students to post their portfolios for reviews since it’s often people who have recently graduated or already have years of experience in the industry. But I’d figure why not share my portfolio site here for discussion since I just recently finished my fall semester classes.

My portfolio site URL is: https://antmartdesign.com/

My portfolio site is pretty straight forward and simple to navigate. No BS landing page or irrelevant information in the way, just pure work. It’s a mix of class assignments, personal design projects, and a small section that includes other miscellaneous non-design stuff.

In the packaging design project pages, I used interactive 360 3D models to display my designs since I thought it was better than a generic online mockup and it’s more hands-on since you can see all of its sides and it feels more realistic too. I used blender 3D and a site called Sirv to make them. It’s perfectly responsive on mobile too! Since they’re a scripted sequence of images and not “real-time” 3D models, there’s no problem with the loading time.

I’m really into packaging design and branding, it’s an area i’d like to work in. I am heading in somewhat the right direction? What advice would you give to make my portfolio stronger?

Firstly, welcome.

Not much I can say, other than, well done.

Currently, the industry is bombarded with Canva kids with no experience, education or ability, pitching themselves as pro freelance designers.

I’d got to a point where although, I knew it, I’d almost lost sight of the fact that there are still talented young people out there who do have faith enough in themselves to invest and go the right way about making something of their skills and evident passion.

You, most definitely are one of them. Are there things wrong with your portfolio? Of course there are. You’re still at university, but what is good about it definitely outweighs the niggles. It’s nothing a little polishing and refinement won’t sort out, but evidently you’ll get there (sorry, not meant to sound as patronising as I think it might).

Of the thousands of naively hopeful portfolios out there crammed with template solutions, most of which are yawningly so far off the mark, if I were hiring, you would be firmly on the YES pile.

As I say, of course there are things that in five years time you’ll see glaringly, but for your stage of the game, I’d say stick at what you’re doing and with the evident passion you show for it.

The thing that normally lets students down is typography. You’ve clearly spent time studying it. It isn’t perfect, but is very good and far better than I’d expect from someone at your stage. It’s also the one thing that makes me sit up and take notice of any portfolio.

[Spoiler: an entire career isn’t enough time to master type. There’s always more to learn.]

I’ve often wondered how young designers get themselves noticed, these days, in amongst all the noise from the oceans of bedroom wannabes. You are exactly how you do it. Quality quietly shouts the loudest.

Finally, as to your question about specialising in packaging. I’d say its probably a good idea. I think in coming years, specialism may well be the most prudent way to go. There are so many mediocre generalists out there that, although you narrow your potential market, to become accomplished in a specific discipline makes you valuable and more visible to the people who you to be seen by.

By the way; just for clarity, regulars around here will know, I’m not usually quick to lavish praise and am typically, brutally critical. For me to not slate anything emphatically has to mean something. I’ve surprised myself!

Stick around, there are a lot of years of experience in the regulars around here and they are always ready to help.

Dear god, I’m exhausted now. Being this gushing takes a lot out of you. It’s a whole new experience for me!

Good job.

1 Like

You’re doing good work — especially for someone who hasn’t graduated.

I especially admire the Uncle Sam illustration. It’s first-rate, A+ work. The Louise Fili poster, which matches her style, is also impressive. The flip book is nice, but I had trouble deciding where her work ended and yours began.

I’m especially impressed by your versatility. You seem able to produce work in several styles and do them all equally well.

Your experimental work with typography animation is very interesting and shows your creativity. However, it probably won’t help you get a job or clients. I’ve found that most employers and clients tend to evaluate work from the viewpoint of how the work they see can translate into fulfilling their needs. Very few can see beyond that to see the creative potential and versatility of the designer.

You mentioned an interest in packaging, which is probably a good career choice since it will always be needed. The technical aspects of packaging design and government regulatory requirements make it beyond the easy reach of the crowdsourcing and Canva crowds of amateurs and semi-pros.

Your package designs are very nice, and I have nothing but good things to say about them. However, the unnatural isometric perspective of the 3D animations is distracting. Is there a way to use three-point perspective instead (I’m not a 3D designer)? If that’s not doable, I’d be tempted to show the rotation from head-on rather than from above.

While I agree that’s a good objective, the front page needs something to tell people what they’re looking at — your design portfolio. A headline at the top and a few lines of type are all it would take.

Speaking of portfolios, designers aren’t expected to be copy editors, but the copy on your portfolio site still needs to be flawless. Your writing contains awkward phrases and wordiness and relies on too much use of the passive voice. If you know a good copy editor, you might want to ask them make a few edits.

Despite my few criticisms, your talent is obvious. I think you’ll have a good start to a great career once you graduate.

1 Like

Wow, that’s very nice of you to say! Thank you for taking the time to write a reply like this. I’m also surprised myself that one of the top critics in this forum managed hit a soft spot on this post. I appreciate it.

But I do agree with pretty much all of your points about improving. There’s always room for it. I still got a lot to learn about typography and layout, not to mention countless other things related to it as well.

About Canva, yes. I’ve seen it firsthand with my fellow classmates and peers. Unfortunately, in the graphic design industry recently, there has been this mindset spreading around that everyone is a designer and graphic design is easy to do because it’s all about making pretty pictures and logos.

People may see it that way because it’s not as technical or complex as other career fields, like programming. Graphic Design is often misunderstood and even sometimes not as respected compared to other fields. With all of these companies pushing for more AI generative tools in their software and the industry’s oversaturation, it’s not really helping for the better.

1 Like

Thank you for your feedback!

Yeah, those drawings are from my newspaper work I did for my college. I was hesitant putting those drawings on my site because:

1.) some of them were political and controversial, which made me worried how people would reflect on me as designer

2.) they weren’t really related to graphic design at all but I’d figure since it was such a huge highlight of my career, I had to display it there as a miscellaneous work.

Yeah, the Louise Fili project was very fun to work on. The booklet was designed as powerpoint presentation, so maybe that’s why it’s a bit confusing on where starts/ends with my work. I studied a LOT on her for this project.

About the isometric perspective of the 3D animations, I did it that way so you can see all of the sides easily (expect the bottom because that’s where barcodes and production information goes and it’s not really necessary for my designs). But I will look into that and see what I can do.

I will also look into the headline suggestion you gave me. I kept it without a headline in the front page because I wanted it to be minimalistic. In fact, for my site’s layout, I actually took a lot of inspiration from this graphic designer’s site: inagakidesign (can’t post urls, look it up)

I even used the same typefaces and fonts. I really liked the layout and design of that site. But I get your point. I will also fix my spelling and grammar mistakes too.

Thank you!

1 Like

Put your contact info on every page. Don’t make people have to find it. Just like when you make your ads for other people, make your call to action easily accessible.

Line

1 Like

Noted.

1 Like

Your illustration is very similar to an 1896 cartoon

Your image

1896 cartoon

Seems suspicious to me

The ‘Tranquil’ boxes
Found the logo on Soundcloud

The other one is a stock image

For the fantasia box - I can’t find it - but pretty sure it’s Thierry Mugler box design/bottle design… I might be wrong but get that impression.

A David Bowie CD? Really?
Similar to what’s on sale right now
image

Louis Filli is a graphic designer - how is this relevant to you?
You clearly took the picture and put a filter over it


Seems to me all your work are derivatives of other easily findable work.

Don’t think for a minute when you’re up against 20 candidates that you won’t be picked apart and eaten up in an interview.

Don’t think for a moment your portfolio won’t be picked apart and questioned and queried.

There’s nothing really original in your work and it’s very sparse.

As you’re a student, that’s expected, you’re not supposed to know it all or have done great things.


Some tips
Maybe add a section to your portfolio that shows the thought process, maybe clicking into a project - and as you scroll down it shows maybe sources for your inspiration for your design.

As right now it looks like you’re presenting these as your ideas, your creations, your photography. But in reality you’ve taken them from various sources which can be found easily.

This might go against you when up against 20 people for the same role. The person who gets it is the most original, the most honest, the most better by a slight hair.


Portfolio reviews and critique aren’t supposed to be nice.

I’m not going to slap you on the back. Take this as an opportunity to improve yourself and your website.

You show promise. But no originality.
That’s an issue.

As a further tip - NEVER put ‘side gig’ or anything like that.

As an employer I don’t want to see you dividing your time between work and side hustles.

That’s a massive negative and instantly puts you in position 20 of the 20 candidates going for the same role.

Hope that helps

Uncle Sam is an iconic visual Americanism that dates back to the American-British War of 1812. (His initials are U.S.) Uncle Sam personifies the U.S. federal government.

Thousands of drawings of Uncle Sam exist from the 19th Century. They were used in editorial cartoons in magazines and newspapers nationwide (usually in ways critical of the federal government). Uncle Sam became especially popular during World War I when he was featured in army recruitment posters.

The similarity of @amart0625’s drawing (giving the benefit of the doubt that he drew it) to 19th-century Uncle Sam drawings is the very quality that makes it interesting, effective, and insightful. It perfectly and intentionally duplicates the 19th-century style and use of Uncle Sam for editorial purposes to criticize a similar modern problem in a way that is seldom seen anymore.

Yeh I’m not from the US - I don’t ‘get it’ so I guess it’s fine, but there are other drawings not entirely in this style, I found it interesting it was very similar to a style that I did find.

To me, it doesn’t come across as ‘original’ but then again, I know little to nothing about illustration/drawing and this could be an issue when at interviews.

I guess point of it too was maybe to elaborate on it a bit more in the portfolio, show stages of the creation etc.

That’s interesting to a portfolio for a young man starting out and when the portfolio is sparse.

It’s more just a ‘watch yourself’ including things that may come across as unoriginal or copied.

1 Like

I appreciate your detailed feedback and criticism.

I agree with some of your points, like how portfolio reviews and critiques aren’t supposed to be nice or how my work is sparse. Yes, it is kinda all over place with the different project types. That’s something I will try to fix when applying to design jobs that specialize in certain position types. I will definitely add a section in the projects where it includes my thought process and ideation process (sketches, wireframes, prototypes, etc.). I will consider comment about my side gig section since that’s something i thought about before.

Even I was taken aback how smoothly and positively my post went. Some people won’t always agree with the work but it’s good to have an opposing view and some criticism since it can benefit as a learning opportunity.

That being said, I’m not sure if I really agree with some your points on the projects themselves. I’ll through each of them one by one.

1.) The Uncle Sam Illustration: i’ll admit this piece isn’t really graphic design-related but I’m not sure what you were thinking here. These two very different images. Yes, I used inspiration from that time period for drawing style but the composition, pose, subjects, and message is entirely different. Like, @Just-B said, Uncle Sam has been used for thousands of editorial drawings/illustrations.

2.) The Tranquil logos: I’m assuming you did a reverse google search to specifically find similar images to those logo designs. I guess the cover on the Soundcloud song is kinda the same but I find that point to be very trivial and random that you pulled up a soundcloud link for it. The other logo of the flower isn’t exactly the same either. Plus, I’m sure there are hundreds of tea brands that used illustrations of flowers or leaves for box designs. It’s very common.

3.) The Fantasia box: I guess the perfume brand I created is sorta similar to Thierry Mugler…? but they’re totally different in the designs (the box pattern, logo, typography, colors, and bottle design). You can make the same argument about every perfume brand. Every perfume brand is similar to one to another in their design.

4.) David Bowie CD: I couldn’t find much but, the image you provided of the David Bowie compilation vinyl isn’t even an official release or anything. They’re a collection of stamps from 2017 and no longer officially on sale. they have been sold out for a long time. They’re two different things.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/DAVID-BOWIE-ALBUM-LIMITED-SHEET/dp/B06XNK6898

5.) Louise Fili: Yes, she is a graphic designer. She’s relevant to me because I’m studying graphic design. What you are referring to is the cover image of the presentation PDF I did. I think it’s good enough and simple, doesn’t need to be overly complicated. With the art deco typography and the tracking of type, it looks nice enough that akin to her style. I used that photo it was one of the few good free high quality photos of her and it’s not like I can just fly over to New York and take a photo of her. I’m not sure what you’re trying to prove with that…

I found these points on the projects to be more nit-picky than constructive.

And the point you made about originality, I don’t think design portfolios necessarily need to be ALL about originality. It’s more of a chance to showcase your technical ability and understanding of the principals and fundamentals (typography, layout, color, composition, software skills, etc.). The job of a graphic designer isn’t to reinvent the wheel, it’s to solve a brief from a client. It’s not like you have total creative control of the projects you are given. Plus, nothing in graphic design is original. Everything has been borrowed and rehashed in some way or shape of another.

The style, lines, colours, etc. are all too similar for me. Looking at different drawings of Uncle Sam online in Google Image search shows, yes the same person, but the style of drawing changes.

For me, and something I think is possible that you created this piece from scratch, or from pieces of images found elsewhere and redraw them.
Which is a kinda plagarism on a drawing.

But hey - if you did it from scratch then kudos - but if you get a job on the back of this and can’t produce this at a job you’re hired at that’s gonna be a big problem for you.

I’m sure you did it and I’m not trying to say you’re lying - but I just want to make you aware of a pitfall you may or may not be setting yourself up to fail.

If you have other illustrations you should add them to your portfolio.


Yes, I used Google Lens, Tineye and another AI one that I can’t remember.

I do this because I once hired a person who had a very nice portfolio and when they came to work they couldn’t do anything useful and a complaint from a customer that a design was very similar to another. I then went back over their portfolio and found that 99% of their work was derivatives and copys of other work.
It did not end well for them.

Back to the tea designs - yeh the sound cloud one is random I thought the same.
But it’s a very common design used for lots of things and availalbe on plenty of stock sites.
Same with the flower - it may not be exact same - but it’s close enough.

Why hire you if I can just go to Adobe stock and download the image myself ?
It’s not original.

When you create something for a client you want it to be original for them, so they can’t just go and download a premade template and not use you.

Think about how generic designs are not going to win over clients.
Yes, tea brands do use illustrations of flowers, and leaves on the box.
But these are illustrations from the fields where the leaves are picked, photos of the actual leaves used to make the tea.
It’s proud for them to show their actual product in raw form - and custom drawn beautiful illustrations of their product.


They’re not. They’re all different.

It just reminded me of his work - which was nice. It’s fine, it’s a packaging design, a box is a box, and a bottle in a box is just that.

No idea what your design was here, the logo, the box, the bottle?
Anyway - it’s nice.

That’s confusion for me in your portfolio. What did you do here?
When you actually get into packaging design it’s fascinating from box creatoin to final product.


Looks almost identical to what you did - it might be different products - but the design is very similar.


Your work is good, don’t get me wrong.

I’m pulling it apart for a reason - so you can fix silly little things and make it better.

You can take the critique or not - it’s up to you - you don’t have to agree with me or anyone else.

If you can justify your work that’s even better. Don’t change it on account of me or anyone else.
Change it because you want to make it better.

You’re 21 and have a nice strong starting portfolio.

I just think it can be better.

If you don’t have more projects to add then add more depth so people can get an idea of what you do.

Keep going - you’re on the right track.

I do like your work. But my only skeptical thing I have is that a lot of it looks like anyone could do it with a few stock images and a free font.

That might sound harsh, but I’m trying to help you.


Your portfolio is good. Just want to reitterate that.

Thanks, I appreciate your perspective on my portfolio. I really do in a humble way. I definitely learned a lot more from your comment than any design professor in my two years of college/university, that’s for sure haha.

They sometimes tend to be lenient on assignment critiques which sets up students with unrealistic outcomes…

Albeit my share of disagreements, I will take some of your advice and improve my portfolio with your comments in mind.

This warrants one of my long, pedantic posts that I can’t stop myself from writing — sorry.

For reference, Uncle Sam is similar to the UK’s John Bull, which might be more familiar to you.

As background, America has a long history of military and behind-the-scenes interventions in Latin American politics that still color the relations between the U.S. and its neighbors to the south. At one time or another, the U.S. has intervened in the internal affairs of most Latin American countries.

Many Uncle Sam editorial cartoons from the late 1800s and early 1900s used Uncle Sam to mock and satirically lampoon these and other meddlings by the U.S. federal government.

Uncle Sam’s personality changed during World War I. Instead of his use in the biting satirical editorials of the 1800s, his personality and perception changed to represent American patriotism due to his use in the widely recognized Uncle Sam Wants You posters created when America entered the War in 1917.

amart0625 attends Miami Dade College in Florida. Latin American immigrants and their descendants greatly influence the Miami area’s diverse culture. Two of the main immigrant groups are Cuban and Haitian.

The cartoon lampoons a federal immigration policy that disproportionately favors Cubans over Haitians by showing Uncle Sam serving benefits to Cuban refugees on a silver platter with no Haitians in sight. It also uses a cartoon style that subtly references the long history of the U.S. federal government’s clumsy treatment of Latin America and its people, as if to say the more things have changed over the past 140 years, the more they’ve stayed the same.

A modern and original interpretation of Uncle Sam wouldn’t convey the historical references in the cartoon. Instead of the well-meaning but ultimately bumbling Uncle Sam of the 19th Century, a modern interpretation of Uncle Sam would lose that historical connection in favor of the contemporary Uncle Sam that epitomizes American patriotism.

Of course, U.S.-Latin American relations are complicated and controversial, with many different viewpoints on the subject. However, this cartoon ran in a student newspaper, and U.S. student newspapers are known for taking on controversial subjects in high-minded, academic ways that embrace controversy.

The cartoon communicates the essence of the student newspaper story it’s meant to illustrate. It also goes beyond that to resurrect, mimic, and parody the old bumbling pre-WWI Uncle Sam. This cartoon is one of the rare pieces in a student portfolio that I would grade as A-plus, professional-quality work.

Many Americans won’t get the subtleties and historical references (especially outside southern Florida). I agree that complementing the final illustration with a couple of work-in-progress shots, as you suggested, might have filled in some of the missing pieces and answered a few questions skeptical art directors might want to know when evaluating the work. Of course, now that it’s done, it’s too late for that.

I have the original B&W sketches (the color was added later through procreate, a digital drawing app for the iPad). Is that good enough show as a work-in progress? I can always edit the site and add more stuff.

Also, since everyone is talking about this particular, I’m not sure anyone else noticed there are three other illustration pieces when you click on the arrows on left/right. Should I add thumbnails at the bottom of the gallery/caption to indicate the number works being shown? I’m wondering because I have feeling people might overlook the arrows on the left/right

While employed in various art director roles, the final choices often came down to two or three candidates who seemed equally qualified. The tie-breaker was often an extra skill that I thought might be useful.

In other words, even though the job description might say graphic designer, the tie-breaker might be your ability to illustrate. It’s a bonus you bring to the negotiating table.

If you can make them visually subordinate to the finished illustration, it’s probably a good idea. Besides, employers often want to know about applicants’ processes, in addition to the final results.

Either that or making the arrows bigger would be good — they are awfully small and easily overlooked.

Noted, I’ll add that.

I know I responded yesterday - but it was hastily and I picked out a few sentences I didn’t agree with.
And the first time in a long time with a portfolio online I felt bad for not taking more time - but the football was on (soccer) and I was settling down to watch a match.

Anyway, I thought long and hard about this before posting and spent some time revamping my words and shaping my response.

As this is the first time in a long time I’ve seen a promising portfolio I felt I didn’t do myself justice or the OP - which is unfair to the OP.

So I’ll go start-over and hope this helps


You’ve done a great job handling all the feedback you’ve received here so far. The fact that you’re taking the time to defend your work, acknowledge critiques, and consider suggestions is a strong indication that you’re on the right track. In the design world, being able to stand your ground while remaining open to improvement is essential, and you’re already demonstrating that. Kudos.

That said, I want to loop back to a few specific points and elaborate on where you could go further:


The illustrations you’ve included are impressive, but I have some concerns concern about their similarity to existing work. This happens often, especially when you’re drawing inspiration from historical or well-known styles. What could set your portfolio apart and make it more professional would be transparency in the creative process.

Strongly suggest a “process” section for each project in your portfolio. This could show your sketches, iterations, or even mood boards to clarify your role in developing these designs. Showing the inspiration behind the work alongside the final product would not only give credit where it’s due but also highlight your ability to evolve ideas into something unique. It’s an opportunity to tell your story as a designer.

For instance, if your Uncle Sam piece was heavily inspired by existing material, explicitly frame it as a reinterpretation or homage rather than an original concept. That clarity will work in your favour and show that you’re both thoughtful and self-aware.

And you’re a talented illustrator - so I think you should include more work, even if it’s hypothetical or personal etc.


Packaging design is not bad, the effort you put into creating interactive 3D displays is fantastic. The designs themselves could use a little more thought in terms of branding and storytelling. Arbitrary images, like the leaves on the tea boxes, might feel generic without context. When creating packaging, ask yourself:

  • What is the brand’s story, and how does the design reflect that?
  • Who is the target audience, and how does the design speak to them?
  • How does the packaging fit into the larger ecosystem of the brand?

If these were hypothetical brands for a project, explain the brief and your decisions. For example, why did you choose the imagery, colour palette, or typography? This will make your work more relatable to potential clients or employers.


Typography is another area where you’re showing promise. Just-B is spot on that it’s a discipline where there’s always more to learn. Keep experimenting, but also seek out constructive critiques specifically focused on type. Sometimes even subtle adjustments like kerning, line height, or font pairings can elevate a design.

As you move forward, versatility will serve you well, but it’s also worth honing in on a distinct style or voice as a designer.


Your portfolio is clean and easy to navigate, but minimalism should never sacrifice clarity. While you aim for a “no BS” approach, a small introduction on your homepage could make a huge difference. A simple headline like, “Welcome to the portfolio of [Your Name], a passionate graphic design student specialising in packaging and branding,” would immediately set the tone for visitors.

Additionally, as mentioned, make your contact info accessible on every page. Think of it as a call-to-action you want to make it as easy as possible for someone to reach out.


The way you’ve responded here has been really mature and professional. Trust me, in the real world, critique can be far harsher and often less constructive. I’ve seen situations where designers have broken down in the middle of a pitch because they weren’t prepared for tough feedback. Your ability to stay composed and use feedback constructively is a strength, and it will serve you well in client meetings and interviews.

Be prepared for real-world critique, it can crush your soul.


Here’s how I see it

  • Add process work to your portfolio to show your thought and creative journey.
  • Refine your packaging projects with a focus on storytelling and branding.
  • Keep pushing your typography skills, strong type is always a standout skill.
  • Incorporate a short intro and ensure contact info is accessible site-wide.

You’re on an excellent path. Keep refining your work, and don’t shy away from constructive feedback, it’s one of the best tools for growth. Your portfolio stands out, and with tweaks, it will only get stronger. Keep up the great work!

2 Likes

Sorry for the late reply. Was busy with other stuff and refining my site.

Thanks for your detailed insight. I’ll definitely take note of those four points you made and improve upon it.

Anyways, this past weekend, I’ve been developing a “splash page” for my portfolio site. I took the intro advice that was suggested here and tried to incorporate a more of warm welcome to my site when you initially load it.

Here it is:

When you load the site now, it plays a simple and clean intro animation of my logo/name appearing on screen that displays my current position, a graphic design student. Later in the future, I can always change it to just “graphic designer” but for now, I’ll keep it like that until I graduate.

Alongside that, another animation also plays after the initial intro that displays text next to the logo of what kind of work I do (branding, packaging, typography, layout, motion graphics, etc.) Simple and clean. It has a 3D-like rotating animation to it so it’s really cool. It replays it every 10 seconds or so.

These animations were produced in After Effects and were exported as a “Lottie” file or a json. They’re essentially like GIFs but higher in quality and vector-based. It took a little bit of custom CSS trickery and experimentation to display them right but I think overall it works perfectly fine, no problems with the loading time. Works perfectly fine on mobile too.

I realized just have a solid white background would’ve boring and dull so I incorporated a cylindrical outline pattern of my logo that slowly rotates 360 degrees and it loops as an MP4. It kinda gives the impression of a large scale library or a dome. It makes a nice screensaver too.

I think this is definitely better than before that had no splash page.