All in all, it’s clean. A few nitpicks are the “one web” wordmark that the ascender of the b being so short is awkward and I think in this case you could find a way to have it extend upwards … perhaps even “interacting” with the rectangular lien above it. And the kerning seems a hair off. It may be also since its reduced in size, but the space between the “o” and “n” seems a little tight. And I keep looking at the first e-w pairing and it looks tight too. I think its an optical trick since the open end of the e is next to it. If you do extend the b it may be worth looking at mimicking the serif on the n on the b to match. And lastly, the salmon pink color for the icon below offers more contrast, and if these two are related, the word mark should match the same salmon pink as the icon.
For the “W” icon, my biggest complaint is why are there two different shadow sizes? The shadow on the white part of the right side arm of the W is smaller than the one on the left.And why the more “angled” perspective shadow on the badge and the inner shadow of the purple background?
Also, if these are for the same “one web” company, it seems odd that the “w”'s don’t match and that there’s just a big “w” for “one web” … ignoring the one?