Critique the GDFO logo

I see nothing wrong with a fancied-up version of a logo for specific usages. As long as there’s a good, simplified version for when the fancier version can’t be used, I see no problem.

1 Like

So, you guys prefer the version with each letter being a single color? Rather than multiple colors? If yes, @kemingMatters please upload a png for both ‘GDF’ and ‘G’. No margins or padding please. Let’s see how it looks like on the site.

I sort of like it the way it is now with Keming’s enhanced treatment. Really, though, I’m totally OK with whatever is decided.

1 Like

Keming’s blinged logo is fine.

1 Like

I like the current one too :slight_smile:

1 Like

Just read through this thread and I really like the one that’s up there now. Nice work everyone, esp @kemingMatters.

1 Like

Looks pretty sharp to me! :slight_smile:

:ok_hand::ok_hand::ok_hand:

1 Like

Oooh that’s fancy. Looks pretty rad if I do say so myself.

1 Like

I agree - we may need a version with a bit of bling for special occasions;

6 Likes

:scream::scream::scream:

Now’s that is fancy!!!

… and Sparkly!!!

HOMER

For certain clients like, um, Donald Trump, these would be perfect. The bottom one would look right at home in his Manhattan penthouse below.

2 Likes

qVd0a_s-200x150

1 Like

On January 22, 2019 we can use the fancy logo to celebrate our re-birth. :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Came up with this solution before scrolling all the way down the thread.

GDFO-logo

Thanks natek.gd ! :slight_smile: I think we are pretty well settled on our look for now :wink:

Gonna close this up for now :heart:

1 Like